E-demand execution challenges taken care of; overlook doomsayers - Ken Ofori-Atta

Friday 1st of November 2024

E-demand execution challenges taken care of; overlook doomsayers - Ken Ofori-Atta

Finance Minister, Ken Ofori-Atta, has said that administration has had the option to determine the underlying difficulties that described the execution of the Electronic Transfer Levy (E-Levy).
He made sense of that the peculiarities were expeditiously recognized and systems have proactively been established to improve the assortment interaction.
"I don't know about any program which has innovation included, that wouldn't have early stage struggles; however positively, the calamitous proclamations by individuals on the opposite side, isn't occurring.
"I think we essentially have it taken care of however much we can. We began on May 1; we were honored with that being a time of occasions for three-four days so we saw the issues and started to handle them," he said.
Talking during a press preparation on Thursday, Mr Ofori-Atta guaranteed that any further issues that would emerge from the execution will be satisfactorily dealt with.
He added that concerns raised about backward expenses have additionally been taken into due thought, an explanation exchanges beneath GH¢100 are not being charged the Levy.
"We are a nation moving truly forward… we realize our pay rates are not excessively high so genuinely, the majority of those that individuals advocate as backward charges are not impacted by any stretch of the imagination; and assuming you have a GH¢200, I am certain you can do it in two days and hence there will be a zero effect.
"We are genuinely amped up for this new duty handle to take a gander at issues of restoring closeout disappointments, expanding our income preparation, getting innovation and progressively moving into an economy wherein, truly, individuals simply don't utilize cash since it's a lot simpler to go on with innovation," he added.
The E-Levy was carried out on May 1. Electronic exchanges above GH¢100 are currently being charged at a pace of 1.5%.
In any case, a few exchanges underneath the limit were burdened.
A portion of the charging elements later discounted the sums that were misguidedly charged to impacted clients.


COMMENTS
  1. author
    Kingsbee

    Nice

  1. author
    Wyclefopoku725

    Ok

  1. author
    Degeneral1234

    OK

  1. author
    PaulSmart

    ok

  1. author
    BetildaOforiwaaAntwi

    Okay

  1. author
    Emmanuelkingosei

    Hhjk

  1. author
    NuumoOglie

    Ohk

  1. author
    shelemiah7

    Hmm

  1. author
    Frankaddai

    Ok

  1. author
    Amigo

    Ok

  1. author
    Ghanaian

    Ok

  1. author
    TOFFICADAM

    Okay

  1. author
    Ayaaba

    Hmmm

  1. author
    Dumourkusi57

    Gg

  1. author
    Samm

    Kk

  1. author
    Armahameleone

    Kk

Page2 of 2
LEAVE A REPLY